One item, two documents
An identifier may appear in the equipment list and be missing from the drawing, or the other way around.
● ENGINEERING / DOCUMENT REVIEW SOFTWARE
Find the mismatch.Keep the evidence.
Review inconsistencies across engineering drawings and equipment lists. Return to the source evidence and keep a record of each review decision.
Early prototype
One focused workflow: equipment-tag comparison across documents.
DOVELA / QA—001ORIGINAL SYNTHETIC EXAMPLE
B / DRAWING · REV A01 / 01
SYN-missing-b-bTAGDESCRIPTION↙
SAVED RESULT / FOR REVIEW
In the list. No matching tag in the drawing.
A controlled prototype example. Select a tag to inspect its result.
01DRAWINGS ↔ LISTS02DOCUMENT CONTEXT03REVISIONS04TRACEABLE EVIDENCE
01 / THE PROBLEM
The information is there.
Consistency takes review.
An engineering package brings together documents that must share the right scope and revision. A difference needs context before it becomes a review finding.
A comparison without context
Different revisions, incompatible scopes or unknown context can invalidate the comparison.
A finding without a source
Reviewers need to return to the document, inspect the evidence and retain the basis for their decision.
02 / THE PRODUCT
Every check has context.
Every decision, a record.
Establish the context
Declare project, scope and revision. When context is unknown or incompatible, the prototype abstains with a stated reason.
Compare the identifiers
Check equipment-tag presence in both directions, retaining original text and source locations.
Review with the source at hand
Inspect the result, record a decision and export a digest-verifiable receipt that can be reopened.
03 / PROTOTYPE EVIDENCE
A workflow you can
inspect.
CURRENT SCOPE
Focused checks. Visible sources.
The prototype compares equipment-tag presence and document-context compatibility. The public viewer lets you explore saved results and record a review in your browser.
- Original synthetic scenarios
- 10
- Expected tag outcomes
- 30
- Prototype input formats
- CSV / SVG / PDF
Evaluation with authorized real documents and engineering reviewers is our next milestone. These results do not measure industrial accuracy or time savings.
What this version covers
The current check does not assess piping topology, design adequacy, regulatory compliance or safety. Pretrained OCR experiments remain separate from the product; no proprietary model has been trained.
04 / EXPLORE AND EVALUATE
The product,
open to inspection.
The demo uses synthetic inputs. This website does not accept project documents.
Evaluation terms ↗Inspect regression results ↗05 / CONTACT
How does your
team review?
We want to understand how drawings, equipment lists and revisions are reviewed in engineering projects. Get in touch to explore the prototype or discuss a future evaluation.
sebastian@dovela.cl ↗